[PATCH] arm64/acpi: Add fixup for HPE m400 quirks
From: Mark Salter <hidden>
Date: 2018-06-15 17:33:15
Also in:
linux-acpi
On Fri, 2018-06-15 at 10:17 -0700, Geoff Levand wrote:
quoted
quoted
+ if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status) && !strncmp(header->oem_id, "HPE ", 6) && + !strncmp(header->oem_table_id, "ProLiant", 8) &&You should match the affected range of OEM table revisions too, that way a firmware upgrade should start working, instead of being permanently disabled because we think its unlikely.The m400 has reached end of life. No one really expects to see any firmware update. I don't know what the effected OEM table revisions are, and I don't think there is an active platform maintainer who could give that info either. If someone can provide the info. I'll update the fix.quoted
quoted
+ MIDR_IMPLEMENTOR(read_cpuid_id()) == ARM_CPU_IMP_APM) {How is the CPU implementer relevant?That was just a copy of what other fixes had. Should I remove it?
It was there because HPE ProLiant strings are generic and you may end up disabling platforms which would otherwise work. It is the ProLiant system based on the APM chipset which is the problem. Thus the check for cpu implementor.