On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 3:44 PM, Manivannan Sadhasivam
[off-list ref] wrote:

On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 03:14:37PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

quoted

On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 9:10 PM, Manivannan Sadhasivam
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

quoted

+static int owl_i2c_master_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg *msgs,
+                               int num)
+{

quoted

+       int ret = 0, idx;

Redundant assignment.

No. Actually the return path will be fixed in next iteration. Please
see my reply to Peter's review for explanation.

How come? I didn't find anything related to this comment in reply you
are referring to.
I left deliberately the below part to show you the pointlessness of an
assignment to 0.

quoted

quoted

+       ret = owl_i2c_hw_init(i2c_dev);
+       if (ret)
+               return ret;

Do you mean you are dropping this in next revision?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko