[PATCH] arm64: Clear the stack
From: Laura Abbott <hidden>
Date: 2018-06-29 20:23:05
Also in:
lkml
On 06/29/2018 01:19 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 12:05 PM, Laura Abbott [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Implementation of stackleak based heavily on the x86 version Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <redacted> [...] +#define current_top_of_stack() (task_stack_page(current) + THREAD_SIZE) +#define on_thread_stack() (on_task_stack(current, current_stack_pointer))nit on types here. I get some warnings: kernel/stackleak.c:55:12: warning: assignment makes integer from pointer without a cast [-Wint-conversion] boundary = current_top_of_stack(); ^ kernel/stackleak.c:65:24: warning: assignment makes integer from pointer without a cast [-Wint-conversion] current->lowest_stack = current_top_of_stack() - THREAD_SIZE / 64; ^ So I think this needs to be: +#define current_top_of_stack() ((unsigned long)task_stack_page(current) + \ + THREAD_SIZE)
Argh, missed that in an amend, can fix for next version if there are no other objections to this approach.
quoted
diff --git a/scripts/Makefile.gcc-plugins b/scripts/Makefile.gcc-plugins index a535742a1c06..972ce4ca7f6a 100644 --- a/scripts/Makefile.gcc-plugins +++ b/scripts/Makefile.gcc-plugins@@ -37,11 +37,14 @@ ifdef CONFIG_GCC_PLUGINS gcc-plugin-$(CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STACKLEAK) += stackleak_plugin.so gcc-plugin-cflags-$(CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STACKLEAK) += -DSTACKLEAK_PLUGIN -fplugin-arg-stackleak_plugin-track-min-size=$(CONFIG_STACKLEAK_TRACK_MIN_SIZE) + ifdef CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STACKLEAK + DISABLE_STACKLEAK_PLUGIN += -fplugin-arg-stackleak_plugin-disable + endif GCC_PLUGINS_CFLAGS := $(strip $(addprefix -fplugin=$(objtree)/scripts/gcc-plugins/, $(gcc-plugin-y)) $(gcc-plugin-cflags-y)) export PLUGINCC GCC_PLUGINS_CFLAGS GCC_PLUGIN GCC_PLUGIN_SUBDIR - export SANCOV_PLUGIN DISABLE_LATENT_ENTROPY_PLUGIN + export SANCOV_PLUGIN DISABLE_LATENT_ENTROPY_PLUGIN DISABLE_STACKLEAK_PLUGIN ifneq ($(PLUGINCC),) # SANCOV_PLUGIN can be only in CFLAGS_KCOV because avoid duplication.If there is a v14, I think this hunk should be taken there, since it's part of the common code. Otherwise, this works for me and passes the lkdtm tests. -Kees
Thanks, Laura