Thread (26 messages) 26 messages, 5 authors, 2018-05-24

[PATCH 1/5] Documentation: DT: Add optional 'timeout-sec' property for sp805

From: Ray Jui <hidden>
Date: 2018-05-23 19:30:00
Also in: linux-devicetree, linux-watchdog, lkml


On 5/23/2018 11:59 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 09:25:49AM -0700, Ray Jui wrote:
quoted

On 5/23/2018 3:57 AM, Robin Murphy wrote:
quoted
On 22/05/18 19:47, Ray Jui wrote:
quoted
Update the SP805 binding document to add optional 'timeout-sec'
devicetree property

Signed-off-by: Ray Jui <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Scott Branden <scott.branden@broadcom.com>
---
 ? Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/sp805-wdt.txt | 2 ++
 ? 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git
a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/sp805-wdt.txt
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/sp805-wdt.txt
index edc4f0e..f898a86 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/sp805-wdt.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/sp805-wdt.txt
@@ -19,6 +19,8 @@ Required properties:
 ? Optional properties:
 ? - interrupts : Should specify WDT interrupt number.
+- timeout-sec : Should specify default WDT timeout in seconds. If
unset, the
+??????????????? default timeout is 30 seconds
According to the SP805 TRM, the default interval is dependent on the
rate of WDOGCLK, but would typically be a lot longer than that :/

On a related note, anyone have any idea why we seem to have two subtly
different SP805 bindings defined?
Sigh.
quoted
Interesting, I did not even know that until you pointed this out (and it's
funny that I found that I actually reviewed arm,sp805.txt internally in
Broadcom code review).

It looks like one was done by Bhupesh Sharma (sp805-wdt.txt) and the other
was done by Anup Patel (arm,sp805.txt). Both were merged at the same time
around March 20, 2016: 915c56bc01d6. I'd assume both were sent out at around
the same time.

It sounds like we should definitely remove one of them. Given that
sp805-wdt.txt appears to have more detailed descriptions on the use of the
clocks, should we remove arm,sp805.txt?
Take whichever text you like, but I prefer filenames using the
compatible string and the correct string is 'arm,sp805' because '-wdt'
is redundant. You can probably safely just update all the dts files with
'arm,sp805' and just remove 'arm,sp805-wdt' because it is not actually
used (as the ID registers are).
Okay. I'll consolidate everything into arm,sp805.txt. Will also fix all 
DTS files to use "arm,sp805". The fix for actual DTS files will be in a 
different patch series.
Rob
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help