Thread (34 messages) 34 messages, 5 authors, 2018-05-17

[PATCH v7 12/14] cpufreq: Add Kryo CPU scaling driver

From: ilialin at codeaurora.org <hidden>
Date: 2018-05-17 07:51:11
Also in: linux-arm-msm, linux-clk, linux-devicetree, linux-pm, lkml

-----Original Message-----
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2018 17:12
To: Amit Kucheria <redacted>
Cc: Ilia Lin <redacted>; Michael Turquette
[off-list ref]; sboyd at kernel.org; Rob Herring
[off-list ref]; Mark Rutland [off-list ref]; nm at ti.com;
lgirdwood at gmail.com; broonie at kernel.org; Andy Gross
[off-list ref]; David Brown [off-list ref];
catalin.marinas at arm.com; will.deacon at arm.com; Rafael J. Wysocki
[off-list ref]; linux-clk at vger.kernel.org;
devicetree at vger.kernel.org; LKML [off-list ref]; Linux
PM list [off-list ref]; linux-arm-msm at vger.kernel.org; linux-
soc at vger.kernel.org; lakml [off-list ref];
Rajendra Nayak [off-list ref]; nicolas.dechesne at linaro.org;
celster at codeaurora.org; tfinkel at codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 12/14] cpufreq: Add Kryo CPU scaling driver

On 16-05-18, 16:12, Amit Kucheria wrote:
quoted
quoted
+       ret = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(opp_temp =
+
dev_pm_opp_set_supported_hw(cpu_dev,&versions,1));
quoted
quoted
+       if (0 > ret)
Any particular reason to prefer this over (ret < 0) that is generally
used? I've seen it used to avoid the == vs. = typos, but not for other
comparisons.

Suggest sticking to what is commonly used i.e. ret < 0.
quoted
+               goto free_opp;
+
+       cpu_dev = get_cpu_device(GOLD_LEAD);
Error check cpu_dev here?
quoted
+       ret = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(opp_temp =
+
dev_pm_opp_set_supported_hw(cpu_dev,&versions,1));
quoted
quoted
+       if (0 > ret)
+               goto free_opp;
The goto here is wrong
If we are here, then the first dev_pm_opp_set_supported_hw() succeeded. And
should be deallocated before exit with error.
quoted
quoted
+
+
+       ret =
PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(platform_device_register_simple("cpufreq-dt",
quoted
quoted
+                                                             -1,
+ NULL, 0));
+
+       if (0 == ret)
+               return 0;
+
+free_opp:
+       dev_pm_opp_put_supported_hw(opp_temp);
This is not needed because dev_pm_opp_set_supported_hw will free
memory in case of failure. This call in only needed in case of a
successful get.
But this is still required for the case where platform device registration
fails.
--
viresh
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help