On 16-05-18, 16:12, Amit Kucheria wrote:
quoted
+ ret = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(opp_temp =
+ dev_pm_opp_set_supported_hw(cpu_dev,&versions,1));
+ if (0 > ret)
Any particular reason to prefer this over (ret < 0) that is generally
used? I've seen it used to avoid the == vs. = typos, but not for other
comparisons.
Suggest sticking to what is commonly used i.e. ret < 0.
quoted
+ goto free_opp;
+
+ cpu_dev = get_cpu_device(GOLD_LEAD);
Error check cpu_dev here?
quoted
+ ret = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(opp_temp =
+ dev_pm_opp_set_supported_hw(cpu_dev,&versions,1));
+ if (0 > ret)
+ goto free_opp;
The goto here is wrong
quoted
+
+
+ ret = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(platform_device_register_simple("cpufreq-dt",
+ -1, NULL, 0));
+
+ if (0 == ret)
+ return 0;
+
+free_opp:
+ dev_pm_opp_put_supported_hw(opp_temp);
This is not needed because dev_pm_opp_set_supported_hw will free
memory in case of failure. This call in only needed in case of a
successful get.
But this is still required for the case where platform device
registration fails.
--
viresh