quoted

+Example for A33:
  	ths: ths at 1c25000 {
  		compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-a33-ths";
  		reg = <0x01c25000 0x100>;

@@ -17,6 +40,27 @@ Example:
  		#io-channel-cells = <0>;
  	};
  
+Example for H3:
+	ths: thermal-sensor at 1c25000 {
+		compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-h3-ths";
+		reg = <0x01c25000 0x400>;
+		clocks = <&ccu CLK_BUS_THS>, <&ccu CLK_THS>;
+		clock-names = "bus", "mod";
+		resets = <&ccu RST_BUS_THS>;
+		interrupts = <GIC_SPI 31 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+		#thermal-sensor-cells = <0>;
+		#io-channel-cells = <0>;
+	};
+
+Example for A83T:
+	ths: thermal-sensor at 1f04000 {
+		compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-a83t-ths";
+		reg = <0x01f04000 0x100>;
+		interrupts = <GIC_SPI 41 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+		#thermal-sensor-cells = <1>;
+		#io-channel-cells = <0>;
+	};
+

I'm wondering if this is actually needed. We've used this convoluted
constructs to be compatible with the old driver, but I'm not sure this
is actually worth it now, and this is causing several issues, among
which:
   - We need to have a bunch of quirks to handle all the DT cases.
   - We need to have an MFD, which isn't really optimal

So I'd rather introduce a new compatible for the old SoCs, keep the
old driver around, and simplify a lot that driver code that will ease
further developments. And we can also get rid of the MFD in the
process. I discussed it with Quentin, and he was ok with it, what do
you think?

(and that would involve creating a new file for the bindings you
introduce here).

Maxime

I think this is a good idea, and the desired way to rework the driver.

To sum up what we talked on IRC:

This will end up in removing the MFD driver and moving the interrupt 
handling into the iio driver. At the end this will also simplify the IRQ 
part.

Philipp