PM regression in next
From: broonie@kernel.org (Mark Brown)
Date: 2018-01-12 21:15:51
Also in:
linux-omap, linux-pm, lkml
On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 01:07:06PM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
(twl4030_dummy_read [snd_soc_twl4030]) from [<bf1cc3b4>] (snd_soc_codec_drv_read+0x1c/0x28 [snd_soc_core]) (snd_soc_codec_drv_read [snd_soc_core]) from [<bf1da1cc>] (snd_soc_dapm_new_widgets+0x29c/0x578 [snd_soc_core]) (snd_soc_dapm_new_widgets [snd_soc_core]) from [<bf1d2f30>] (snd_soc_register_card+0xad0/0xe30 [snd_soc_core]) (snd_soc_register_card [snd_soc_core]) from [<bf1e1850>] (devm_snd_soc_register_card+0x30/0x70 [snd_soc_core]) (devm_snd_soc_register_card [snd_soc_core]) from [<bf234364>] (omap_twl4030_probe+0x100/0x1d0 [snd_soc_omap_twl4030]) (omap_twl4030_probe [snd_soc_omap_twl4030]) from [<c0606660>] (platform_drv_probe+0x50/0xb0)
So does the read not happen otherwise? Or is it failing somehow and the error getting ignored?
So probably there are other asoc drivers broken too with these kind of patches until snd_soc_codec_drv_write() and snd_soc_codec_drv_read() are fixed?
I rather suspect someone would've noticed by now TBH - I suspect this is more likely to be an issue with the rather baroque code that the TWL drivers have possibly coupled with the whole multiple I2C devices issue. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 488 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20180112/f7329e49/attachment.sig>