[PATCH] rtc: add mxc driver for i.MX53
From: Alexandre Belloni <hidden>
Date: 2017-11-30 13:42:26
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-rtc, lkml
Hi, On 30/11/2017 at 13:36:22 +0000, Patrick Br?nn wrote:
quoted
From: Philippe Ombredanne [mailto:pombredanne at nexb.com] Sent: Donnerstag, 30. November 2017 09:18quoted
quoted
+/* + * Copyright (C) 2004-2011 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All RightsReserved.quoted
quoted
+ */ + +/* + * The code contained herein is licensed under the GNU General Public + * License. You may obtain a copy of the GNU General Public License + * Version 2 or later at the following locations: + * + * http://www.opensource.org/licenses/gpl-license.html + * http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html + */Exactly! And while you are it , you could replace the boilerplate license text with the SPDX id. --How would a perfect header look like? Looking at : git show b24413180f5600bcb3bb70fbed5cf186b60864bd -- drivers/ and: git grep SPDX -- Documentation/ it could be: +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ +/* + * Copyright (C) 2004-2011 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All Rights + */ or: +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* + * Copyright (C) 2004-2011 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All Rights + */ Personally I would prefer: +/* + * Copyright (C) 2004-2011 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All Rights + * + * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 + */ So, is there any guideline?
I'm quoting LWN here: "For normal C source files, the string will be a comment using the "//" syntax; header files, instead, use traditional (/* */) comments for reasons related to tooling."
To be clear: I don't want to waste anyone's time on this. But as SPDX was intended for automation, I think it might be good to try having some common pattern here. I don't want to start a discussion, so in case there is no guideline I will just take the /* SPDX */ in firstline version.
-- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com