Thread (21 messages) flat view 21 messages, 4 authors, 2017-11-14

linux-next: Tree for Nov 7

From: mhocko@kernel.org (Michal Hocko)
Date: 2017-11-14 09:05:18
Also in: linux-mips, linux-next, linux-sh, linuxppc-dev, lkml, sparclinux

On Tue 14-11-17 19:54:59, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Michal Hocko [off-list ref] writes:
[...]
quoted
So this was the most simple solution I could come up
with. If there was a general interest for MAP_FIXED_SAFE then we can
introduce it later of course. I would just like the hardening merged
sooner rather than later.
Sure. But in the scheme of things one more kernel release is not that
big a deal to get it right. Given that the simple approach of dropping
MAP_FIXED turns out to not be simple at all.
Well, my idea was to push this hardening to older kernels because those
were more vulnerable for the PIE base vs. stack placement and stack
controllable size from userspace etc... Anyway, as per [1] it seems that
the MAP_FIXED_SAFE doesn't look terrible from the backporting POV.

If there is a general consensus that this is the preferred way to go, I
will post the patch as an RFC to linux-api

[1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171113160637.jhekbdyfpccme3be at dhcp22.suse.cz
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help