linux-next: Tree for Nov 7
From: mhocko@kernel.org (Michal Hocko)
Date: 2017-11-13 09:42:09
Also in:
linux-mips, linux-next, linux-sh, linuxppc-dev, lkml, sparclinux
Subsystem:
arm port, exec & binfmt api, elf, filesystems (vfs and infrastructure), linux for powerpc (32-bit and 64-bit), mips, parisc architecture, sparc + ultrasparc (sparc/sparc64), superh, tensilica xtensa port (xtensa), the rest · Maintainers:
Russell King, Kees Cook, Alexander Viro, Christian Brauner, Madhavan Srinivasan, Thomas Bogendoerfer, "James E.J. Bottomley", Helge Deller, "David S. Miller", Andreas Larsson, Yoshinori Sato, Rich Felker, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz, Chris Zankel, Max Filippov, Linus Torvalds
On Mon 13-11-17 10:20:06, Michal Hocko wrote:
[Cc arm and ppc maintainers]
Hmm, it turned out to be a problem on other architectures as well. CCing more maintainers. For your reference, we are talking about http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171023082608.6167-1-mhocko at kernel.org which has broken architectures which do apply aligning on the mmap address hint without MAP_FIXED applied. See below my proposed way around this issue because I belive that the above patch is quite valuable on its own to be dropped for all archs.
Thanks a lot for testing! On Sun 12-11-17 11:38:02, Joel Stanley wrote:quoted
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 11:00 PM, Michal Hocko [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Hi Joel, On Wed 08-11-17 15:20:50, Michal Hocko wrote: [...]quoted
quoted
There are a lot of messages on the way up that look like this: [ 2.527460] Uhuuh, elf segement at 000d9000 requested but the memory is mapped already [ 2.540160] Uhuuh, elf segement at 000d9000 requested but the memory is mapped already [ 2.546153] Uhuuh, elf segement at 000d9000 requested but the memory is mapped already And then trying to run userspace looks like this:Could you please run with debugging patch posted http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171107102854.vylrtaodla63kc57 at dhcp22.suse.czDid you have chance to test with this debugging patch, please?Lots of this: [ 1.177266] Uhuuh, elf segement at 000d9000 requested but the memory is mapped already, got 000dd000 [ 1.177555] Clashing vma [dd000, de000] flags:100873 name:(null)This smells like the problem I've expected that mmap with hint doesn't respect the hint even though there is no clashing mapping. The above basically says that we didn't map at 0xd9000 but it has placed it at 0xdd000. The nearest (clashing) vma is at 0xdd000 so this is our new mapping. find_vma returns the closest vma (with addr < vm_end) for the given address 0xd9000 so this address cannot be mapped by any other vma. Now that I am looking at arm's arch_get_unmapped_area it does perform aligning for shared vmas. We do not do that for MAP_FIXED. Powepc, reported earlier [1] seems to suffer from the similar problem. slice_get_unmapped_area alignes to slices, whatever that means. I can see two possible ways around that. Either we explicitly request non-aligned mappings via a special MAP_$FOO (e.g. MAP_FIXED_SAFE) or simply opt out from the MAP_FIXED protection via ifdefs. The first option sounds more generic to me but also more tricky to not introduce other user visible effects. The later is quite straightforward. What do you think about the following on top of the previous patch? It is rather terse and disables the MAP_FIXED protection for arm comletely because I couldn't find a way to make it conditional on CACHEID_VIPT_ALIASING. But this can be always handled later. I find the protection for other archtectures useful enough to have this working for most architectures now and handle others specially. [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1510048229.12079.7.camel at abdul.in.ibm.com ---
diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
index 61a0cb15067e..018d041a30e6 100644
--- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig@@ -99,6 +99,7 @@ config ARM select PERF_USE_VMALLOC select RTC_LIB select SYS_SUPPORTS_APM_EMULATION + select ARCH_ALIGNED_MMAPS # Above selects are sorted alphabetically; please add new ones # according to that. Thanks. help
diff --git a/arch/mips/Kconfig b/arch/mips/Kconfig
index 48d91d5be4e9..eca59d27e9f1 100644
--- a/arch/mips/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/mips/Kconfig@@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ config MIPS select RTC_LIB if !MACH_LOONGSON64 select SYSCTL_EXCEPTION_TRACE select VIRT_TO_BUS + select ARCH_ALIGNED_MMAPS menu "Machine selection"
diff --git a/arch/parisc/Kconfig b/arch/parisc/Kconfig
index 22f27ec8c117..8376d16e0a4a 100644
--- a/arch/parisc/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/parisc/Kconfig@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ config PARISC select GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS select ARCH_NO_COHERENT_DMA_MMAP select CPU_NO_EFFICIENT_FFS + select ARCH_ALIGNED_MMAPS help The PA-RISC microprocessor is designed by Hewlett-Packard and used
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype b/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype
index 2f629e0551e9..156f69c09c7f 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype@@ -368,6 +368,7 @@ config PPC_MM_SLICES bool default y if PPC_STD_MMU_64 default n + select ARCH_ALIGNED_MMAPS config PPC_HAVE_PMU_SUPPORT bool
diff --git a/arch/sh/Kconfig b/arch/sh/Kconfig
index 640a85925060..ac1d4637a728 100644
--- a/arch/sh/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/sh/Kconfig@@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ config SUPERH select HAVE_ARCH_AUDITSYSCALL select HAVE_FUTEX_CMPXCHG if FUTEX select HAVE_NMI + select ARCH_ALIGNED_MMAPS help The SuperH is a RISC processor targeted for use in embedded systems and consumer electronics; it was also used in the Sega Dreamcast
diff --git a/arch/sparc/Kconfig b/arch/sparc/Kconfig
index 0be3828752e5..c265dcda3d28 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/sparc/Kconfig@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ config SPARC select CPU_NO_EFFICIENT_FFS select LOCKDEP_SMALL if LOCKDEP select ARCH_WANT_RELAX_ORDER + select ARCH_ALIGNED_MMAPS if SPARC64 config SPARC32 def_bool !64BIT
diff --git a/arch/xtensa/Kconfig b/arch/xtensa/Kconfig
index 7ad6d77b2f22..a5cf535034d1 100644
--- a/arch/xtensa/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/xtensa/Kconfig@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ config XTENSA select NO_BOOTMEM select PERF_USE_VMALLOC select VIRT_TO_BUS + select ARCH_ALIGNED_MMAPS if MMU help Xtensa processors are 32-bit RISC machines designed by Tensilica primarily for embedded systems. These processors are both
diff --git a/fs/binfmt_elf.c b/fs/binfmt_elf.c
index a22718de42db..d23eb89f31c0 100644
--- a/fs/binfmt_elf.c
+++ b/fs/binfmt_elf.c@@ -345,13 +345,19 @@ static unsigned long elf_vm_mmap(struct file *filep, unsigned long addr, unsigned long size, int prot, int type, unsigned long off) { unsigned long map_addr; + unsigned long map_type = type; /* * If caller requests the mapping at a specific place, make sure we fail * rather than potentially clobber an existing mapping which can have - * security consequences (e.g. smash over the stack area). + * security consequences (e.g. smash over the stack area). Be careful + * about architectures which do not respect the address hint due to + * aligning restrictions for !fixed mappings. */ - map_addr = vm_mmap(filep, addr, size, prot, type & ~MAP_FIXED, off); + if (!IS_ENABLED(ARCH_ALIGNED_MMAPS)) + map_type &= ~MAP_FIXED; + + map_addr = vm_mmap(filep, addr, size, prot, map_type, off); if (BAD_ADDR(map_addr)) return map_addr;
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs