Thread (19 messages) 19 messages, 2 authors, 2017-10-04
STALE3181d

[PATCH 3/5] firmware: arm_scpi: pre-populate dvfs info in scpi_probe

From: Sudeep Holla <hidden>
Date: 2017-10-02 11:17:49


On 29/09/17 22:44, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Pre-populating the dvfs info data in scpi_probe allows to make all
memory allocations device-managed. This helps to simplify scpi_remove
and eventually to get rid of scpi_remove completely.

Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/firmware/arm_scpi.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scpi.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scpi.c
index d80d11ae..fd79adb5 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scpi.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scpi.c
@@ -644,35 +644,35 @@ static int opp_cmp_func(const void *opp1, const void *opp2)
 }
 
 static struct scpi_dvfs_info *scpi_dvfs_get_info(u8 domain)
+{
+	if (domain >= MAX_DVFS_DOMAINS)
+		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+
+	return scpi_info->dvfs[domain] ?: ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+}
+
+static int scpi_dvfs_populate_info(struct device *dev, u8 domain)
 {
 	struct scpi_dvfs_info *info;
 	struct scpi_opp *opp;
 	struct dvfs_info buf;
 	int ret, i;
 
-	if (domain >= MAX_DVFS_DOMAINS)
-		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
-
-	if (scpi_info->dvfs[domain])	/* data already populated */
-		return scpi_info->dvfs[domain];
-
 	ret = scpi_send_message(CMD_GET_DVFS_INFO, &domain, sizeof(domain),
 				&buf, sizeof(buf));
 	if (ret)
-		return ERR_PTR(ret);
+		return ret;
 
-	info = kmalloc(sizeof(*info), GFP_KERNEL);
+	info = devm_kmalloc(dev, sizeof(*info), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!info)
-		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	info->count = DVFS_OPP_COUNT(buf.header);
 	info->latency = DVFS_LATENCY(buf.header) * 1000; /* uS to nS */
 
-	info->opps = kcalloc(info->count, sizeof(*opp), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!info->opps) {
-		kfree(info);
-		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
-	}
+	info->opps = devm_kcalloc(dev, info->count, sizeof(*opp), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!info->opps)
+		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	for (i = 0, opp = info->opps; i < info->count; i++, opp++) {
 		opp->freq = le32_to_cpu(buf.opps[i].freq);
@@ -682,7 +682,20 @@ static struct scpi_dvfs_info *scpi_dvfs_get_info(u8 domain)
 	sort(info->opps, info->count, sizeof(*opp), opp_cmp_func, NULL);
 
 	scpi_info->dvfs[domain] = info;
-	return info;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int scpi_dvfs_populate(struct device *dev)
+{
+	int ret, i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < MAX_DVFS_DOMAINS; i++) {
+		ret = scpi_dvfs_populate_info(dev, i);
+		if (ret)
+			break;
Does it make sense to continue to complete all MAX_DVFS_DOMAINS ?
Just wondering if there will be any firmware that returns errors for
few domains(e.g. not supported in initial versions of firmware).
I don't want to stop probing due to that. Let me know what you think.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help