Thread (58 messages) 58 messages, 10 authors, 2018-02-26

[PATCH 04/11] Define the virtual space of KASan's shadow region

From: linux@armlinux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
Date: 2017-10-19 12:41:19
Also in: linux-mm, lkml

On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 11:42:05AM +0000, Liuwenliang (Lamb) wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
On 10/16/2017 07:03 PM, Abbott Liu wrote:
quoted
arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S:348: Error: selected processor does not support `movw r1,
  #:lower16:((((0xC0000000-0x01000000)>>3)+((0xC0000000-0x01000000)-(1<<29))))' in ARM mode
quoted
arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S:348: Error: selected processor does not support `movt r1,
  #:upper16:((((0xC0000000-0x01000000)>>3)+((0xC0000000-0x01000000)-(1<<29))))' in ARM mode

Thanks for building test. This error can be solved by following code:
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S
@@ -188,8 +188,7 @@ ENDPROC(__und_invalid)
        get_thread_info tsk
        ldr     r0, [tsk, #TI_ADDR_LIMIT]
 #ifdef CONFIG_KASAN
-   movw r1, #:lower16:TASK_SIZE
-   movt r1, #:upper16:TASK_SIZE
+ ldr r1, =TASK_SIZE
 #else
        mov r1, #TASK_SIZE
 #endif
We can surely do better than this with macros and condition support -
we can build-time test in the assembler whether TASK_SIZE can fit in a
normal "mov", whether we can use the movw/movt instructions, or fall
back to ldr if necessary.  I'd rather we avoided "ldr" here where
possible.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -446,7 +445,12 @@ ENDPROC(__fiq_abt)
        @ if it was interrupted in a critical region.  Here we
        @ perform a quick test inline since it should be false
        @ 99.9999% of the time.  The rest is done out of line.
+#if CONFIG_KASAN
+ ldr r0, =TASK_SIZE
+ cmp r4, r0
+#else
        cmp     r4, #TASK_SIZE
Same sort of thing goes for here - we can select the instruction at
runtime using the assembler's macros and condition support.

We know that TASK_SIZE is going to be one of a limited set of values.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 8.8Mbps down 630kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 8.21Mbps down 510kbps up
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help