On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 02:42:49AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
On 11.10.2017 11:22, Abbott Liu wrote:
quoted
+void __init kasan_map_early_shadow(pgd_t *pgdp)
+{
+ int i;
+ unsigned long start = KASAN_SHADOW_START;
+ unsigned long end = KASAN_SHADOW_END;
+ unsigned long addr;
+ unsigned long next;
+ pgd_t *pgd;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < PTRS_PER_PTE; i++)
+ set_pte_at(&init_mm, KASAN_SHADOW_START + i*PAGE_SIZE,
+ &kasan_zero_pte[i], pfn_pte(
+ virt_to_pfn(kasan_zero_page),
+ __pgprot(_L_PTE_DEFAULT | L_PTE_DIRTY | L_PTE_XN)));
Shouldn't all __pgprot's contain L_PTE_MT_WRITETHROUGH ?
One of the architecture restrictions is that the cache attributes of
all aliases should match (but there is a specific workaround that
permits this, provided that the dis-similar mappings aren't accessed
without certain intervening instructions.)
Why should it be L_PTE_MT_WRITETHROUGH, and not the same cache
attributes as the lowmem mapping?
--
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 8.8Mbps down 630kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 8.21Mbps down 510kbps up