Thread (23 messages) 23 messages, 3 authors, 2017-09-25

[PATCH v2 06/10] arm64: allwinner: a64: Add devicetree binding for DMA controller

From: robh@kernel.org (Rob Herring)
Date: 2017-09-25 04:12:50
Also in: linux-devicetree, lkml

On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 6:34 PM, Stefan Bruens
[off-list ref] wrote:
On Mittwoch, 20. September 2017 22:53:00 CEST Rob Herring wrote:
quoted
On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 05:19:52AM +0200, Stefan Br?ns wrote:
quoted
The A64 is register compatible with the H3, but has a different number
of dma channels and request ports.

Attach additional properties to the node to allow future reuse of the
compatible for controllers with different number of channels/requests.

If dma-requests is not specified, the register layout defined maximum
of 32 is used.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Br?ns <redacted>
---

 .../devicetree/bindings/dma/sun6i-dma.txt          | 26
 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/sun6i-dma.txt
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/sun6i-dma.txt index
98fbe1a5c6dd..6ebc79f95202 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/sun6i-dma.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/sun6i-dma.txt
@@ -27,6 +27,32 @@ Example:
            #dma-cells = <1>;

    };

+-------------------------------------------------------------------------
----- +For A64 DMA controller:
+
+Required properties:
+- compatible:      "allwinner,sun50i-a64-dma"
+- dma-channels: Number of DMA channels supported by the controller.
+           Refer to Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/dma.txt
+- all properties above, i.e. reg, interrupts, clocks, resets and
#dma-cells +
+Optional properties:
+- dma-requests: Number of DMA request signals supported by the
controller.
+           Refer to Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/dma.txt
+
+Example:
+   dma: dma-controller at 01c02000 {
Drop the leading 0. Building dtbs with W=2 will tell you this.

With that,

Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
The leading 0 was copied from the A31 example just a few lines above. Should I
also correct that one, or should that go in a separate patch?
A separate patch.

Rob
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help