n900 in next-20170901
From: Joonsoo Kim <hidden>
Date: 2017-09-18 01:59:40
Also in:
linux-omap, lkml
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 03:18:18PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!quoted
quoted
After commit 9caf25f996e8, user for CMA memory should use to check PageHighmem in order to get proper virtual address of the page. If someone doesn't use it, it is possible to use wrong virtual address and it then causes the use of wrong physical address. CONFIG_DEBUG_VIRTUAL would catch this case.OK, no extra output of current next with CONFIG_DEBUG_VIRTUAL=y. Booting of n900 hangs with just the same error: save_secure_sram() returns 0000ff02quoted
If it doesn't help, is there a way to test n900 configuration in QEMU?I doubt that QEMU n900 boots in secure mode but instead shows the SoC as general purpose SoC. If so, you'd have to patch the omap3_save_secure_ram_context() to attempt to save secure RAM context in all cases. If that works then debugging with any omap3 board like beagleboard in QEMU should work.Okay, linux-next from today still does not boot on n900. Is it something new, or was this still not fixed in -next?
Hello, Still not fixed in -next since I cannot regenerate the error. Thanks.