On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 03:39:04PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:

On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Corentin Labbe
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 09:19:54AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:

quoted

On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 09:11:47AM +0200, Corentin Labbe wrote:

quoted

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5-nanopi-neo2.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5-nanopi-neo2.dts
index 1c2387bd5df6..968908761194 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5-nanopi-neo2.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5-nanopi-neo2.dts

@@ -50,6 +50,7 @@
    compatible = "friendlyarm,nanopi-neo2", "allwinner,sun50i-h5";

    aliases {
+           ethernet0 = &emac;
            serial0 = &uart0;
    };

@@ -108,6 +109,22 @@
    status = "okay";
 };

+&emac {
+   pinctrl-names = "default";
+   pinctrl-0 = <&emac_rgmii_pins>;
+   phy-supply = <&reg_gmac_3v3>;
+   phy-handle = <&ext_rgmii_phy>;
+   phy-mode = "rgmii";
+   status = "okay";
+};
+
+&mdio {
+   ext_rgmii_phy: ethernet-phy at 7 {
+           compatible = "ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c22";
+           reg = <7>;
+   };
+};
+

This won't compile, you don't have that node in the H5 DTSI.

Since H5 DTSI include arm/sunxi-h3-h5.dtsi it compiles.
Furthermore, I restested just now and confirm, it compiles fine.

The order of your patches are wrong. No individual patch should
introduce build failures, not just the whole patch series.

Yes, I just miss-understood the reason of build failure.
I will fix the order in the next serie.

Thanks
Corentin Labbe