On 08/04, Sudeep Holla wrote:

Is this include used?

+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/scmi_protocol.h>
+
+struct scmi_clk {
+	u32 id;
+	struct clk_hw hw;
+	const struct scmi_clock_info *info;
+	const struct scmi_handle *handle;
+};
+
+#define to_scmi_clk(clk) container_of(clk, struct scmi_clk, hw)
+
+static unsigned long scmi_clk_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
+					  unsigned long parent_rate)
+{
+	int ret;
+	u64 rate;
+	struct scmi_clk *clk = to_scmi_clk(hw);
+
+	ret = clk->handle->clk_ops->rate_get(clk->handle, clk->id, &rate);
+	if (ret)
+		return 0;
+	return rate;
+}
+
+static long scmi_clk_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
+				unsigned long *parent_rate)
+{
+	u64 fmin, fmax, ftmp;
+	struct scmi_clk *clk = to_scmi_clk(hw);
+
+	/*
+	 * We can't figure out what rate it will be, so just return the
+	 * rate back to the caller. scmi_clk_recalc_rate() will be called
+	 * after the rate is set and we'll know what rate the clock is
+	 * running at then.
+	 */
+	if (clk->info->rate_discrete)
+		return rate;
+
+	fmin = clk->info->range.min_rate;
+	fmax = clk->info->range.max_rate;
+	for (ftmp = fmin; ftmp <= fmax; ftmp += clk->info->range.step_size) {
+		if (ftmp >= rate) {
+			if (ftmp <= fmax)
+				fmax = ftmp;
+			break;
+		} else if (ftmp >= fmin) {
+			fmin = ftmp;
+		}
+	}

Are the max_rate and min_rate potentially unaligned with the
step_size? Do any of these things change at runtime? It seems
like we could do some simple math instead of this for loop unless
I missed something.

+	return fmax != clk->info->range.max_rate ? fmax : fmin;
+}
+
+static int scmi_clk_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
+			     unsigned long parent_rate)
+{
+	struct scmi_clk *clk = to_scmi_clk(hw);
+
+	return clk->handle->clk_ops->rate_set(clk->handle, clk->id, 0, rate);
+}
+
+static int scmi_clk_enable(struct clk_hw *hw)
+{
+	struct scmi_clk *clk = to_scmi_clk(hw);
+
+	return clk->handle->clk_ops->enable(clk->handle, clk->id);
+}
+
+static void scmi_clk_disable(struct clk_hw *hw)
+{
+	struct scmi_clk *clk = to_scmi_clk(hw);
+
+	clk->handle->clk_ops->disable(clk->handle, clk->id);
+}
+
+static const struct clk_ops scmi_clk_ops = {
+	.recalc_rate = scmi_clk_recalc_rate,
+	.round_rate = scmi_clk_round_rate,
+	.set_rate = scmi_clk_set_rate,
+	/*
+	 * We can't provide enable/disable callback as we can't perform the same
+	 * in atomic context. Since the clock framework provides standard API
+	 * clk_prepare_enable that helps cases using clk_enable in non-atomic
+	 * context, it should be fine providing prepare/unprepare.
+	 */
+	.prepare = scmi_clk_enable,
+	.unprepare = scmi_clk_disable,
+};
+
+static int scmi_clk_ops_init(struct device *dev, struct scmi_clk *sclk)
+{
+	int ret;
+	struct clk_init_data init;

Best to do = { } here in case we add something else to the init
structure in future.

+
+	init.flags = CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE;
+	init.num_parents = 0;
+	init.ops = &scmi_clk_ops;
+	init.name = sclk->info->name;
+	sclk->hw.init = &init;
+
+	ret = devm_clk_hw_register(dev, &sclk->hw);
+	if (!ret)
+		clk_hw_set_rate_range(&sclk->hw, sclk->info->range.min_rate,
+				      sclk->info->range.max_rate);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int scmi_clk_add(struct device *dev, struct device_node *np,
+			const struct scmi_handle *handle)
+{
+	int idx, count, err;
+	struct clk_hw **hws;
+	struct clk_hw_onecell_data *clk_data;
+
+	count = handle->clk_ops->count_get(handle);
+	if (count < 0) {
+		dev_err(dev, "%s: invalid clock output count\n", np->name);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	clk_data = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*clk_data) +
+				sizeof(*clk_data->hws) * count, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!clk_data)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	clk_data->num = count;
+	hws = clk_data->hws;
+
+	for (idx = 0; idx < count; idx++) {
+		struct scmi_clk *sclk;
+
+		sclk = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*sclk), GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (!sclk)
+			return -ENOMEM;
+
+		sclk->info = handle->clk_ops->info_get(handle, idx);
+		if (!sclk->info) {
+			dev_dbg(dev, "invalid clock info for idx %d\n", idx);
+			continue;
+		}
+
+		sclk->id = idx;
+		sclk->handle = handle;
+
+		err = scmi_clk_ops_init(dev, sclk);
+		if (err) {
+			dev_err(dev, "failed to register clock %d\n", idx);
+			devm_kfree(dev, sclk);
+			hws[idx] = NULL;
+		} else {
+			dev_dbg(dev, "Registered clock:%s\n", sclk->info->name);
+			hws[idx] = &sclk->hw;
+		}
+	}
+
+	return of_clk_add_hw_provider(np, of_clk_hw_onecell_get, clk_data);
+}
+
+static int scmi_clocks_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
+
+	of_clk_del_provider(np);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int scmi_clocks_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
+	const struct scmi_handle *handle = devm_scmi_handle_get(dev);
+
+	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(handle) || !handle->clk_ops)
+		return -EPROBE_DEFER;
+
+	return scmi_clk_add(dev, np, handle);

Why the function? We support more than just platform devices?
Just fold scmi_clk_add() into this function instead please.

+}
+
+static struct platform_driver scmi_clocks_driver = {
+	.driver	= {
+		.name = "scmi-clocks",
+	},
+	.probe = scmi_clocks_probe,
+	.remove = scmi_clocks_remove,
+};
+module_platform_driver(scmi_clocks_driver);
+
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Sudeep Holla [off-list ref]");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("ARM SCMI clock driver");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
-- 
2.7.4

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project