[PATCH 3/3] net-next: stmmac: dwmac-sun8i: choose internal PHY via compatible
From: clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com (Corentin Labbe)
Date: 2017-07-28 09:54:45
Also in:
linux-devicetree, lkml, netdev
From: clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com (Corentin Labbe)
Date: 2017-07-28 09:54:45
Also in:
linux-devicetree, lkml, netdev
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 05:49:55PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 5:28 PM, Corentin Labbe [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
The current way to find if the phy is internal is to compare DT phy-mode and emac_variant/internal_phy. But it will negate a possible future SoC where an external PHY use the same phy mode than the internal one. This patch adds a new way to find if the PHY is internal, via its compatible. Since the phy_mode of the internal PHY does need to be know, the variant internal_phy member is converted to a boolean. Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com> --- drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-sun8i.c | 16 ++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-sun8i.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-sun8i.c index fffd6d5fc907..04f7ddd802b0 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-sun8i.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-sun8i.c@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ */ struct emac_variant { u32 default_syscon_value; - int internal_phy; + bool internal_phy;Nit: please add a verb to the name, like "has_internal_phy", or even "soc_has_internal_phy". This makes it clear what this property represents. ChenYu
I will use soc_has_internal_phy Thanks