[PATCH 6/6] ARM: dts: rockchip: add efuse device node for rk3228
From: heiko@sntech.de (Heiko Stübner)
Date: 2017-06-16 09:35:21
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-mmc, linux-rockchip, lkml
Am Freitag, 16. Juni 2017, 17:24:23 CEST schrieb Frank Wang:
Hi Heiko, On 2017/6/15 23:10, Heiko Stuebner wrote:quoted
Hi Frank, Am Donnerstag, 15. Juni 2017, 15:23:16 CEST schrieb Frank Wang:quoted
From: Finley Xiao <redacted> Add a efuse node in the device tree for the rk3228 SoC. Signed-off-by: Finley Xiao <redacted> --- arch/arm/boot/dts/rk322x.dtsi | 17 +++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk322x.dtsib/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk322x.dtsi index c2a78f4..dad195e 100644--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk322x.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk322x.dtsi@@ -314,6 +314,23 @@ status = "disabled"; }; + efuse: efuse at 11040000 { + compatible = "rockchip,rk322x-efuse";was this binding included already? Simply because compatibles should not contain placeholders, so rockchip,rk3228-efuse please - same for the driver side.Actually, I always remember it should be without placeholders from the first time you commented :-) but I saw that the binding and driver (rockchip,rk322x-efuse) have already been applied, so I send this one keep the same with driver side. Shall I resend a new patch to correct both of them to 'rockchip,rk3228-efuse' ?
Yes please :-) . As it was probably applied for 4.13, changing the compatible shouldn't be a problem. Thanks Heiko
BR. Frankquoted
Heikoquoted
+ reg = <0x11040000 0x20>; + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <1>; + clocks = <&cru PCLK_EFUSE_256>; + clock-names = "pclk_efuse"; + + /* Data cells */ + efuse_id: id at 7 { + reg = <0x7 0x10>; + }; + cpu_leakage: cpu_leakage at 17 { + reg = <0x17 0x1>; + }; + }; + i2c0: i2c at 11050000 { compatible = "rockchip,rk3228-i2c"; reg = <0x11050000 0x1000>;