Thread (16 messages) read the whole thread 16 messages, 2 authors, 2017-06-20

[PATCH 6/6] ARM: dts: rockchip: add efuse device node for rk3228

From: Frank Wang <hidden>
Date: 2017-06-16 09:25:12
Also in: linux-devicetree, linux-mmc, linux-rockchip, lkml

Hi Heiko,

On 2017/6/15 23:10, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
Hi Frank,

Am Donnerstag, 15. Juni 2017, 15:23:16 CEST schrieb Frank Wang:
quoted
From: Finley Xiao <redacted>

Add a efuse node in the device tree for the rk3228 SoC.

Signed-off-by: Finley Xiao <redacted>
---
  arch/arm/boot/dts/rk322x.dtsi | 17 +++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk322x.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk322x.dtsi
index c2a78f4..dad195e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk322x.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk322x.dtsi
@@ -314,6 +314,23 @@
  		status = "disabled";
  	};
  
+	efuse: efuse at 11040000 {
+		compatible = "rockchip,rk322x-efuse";
was this binding included already? Simply because compatibles should
not contain placeholders, so rockchip,rk3228-efuse please - same for
the driver side.
Actually, I always remember it should be without placeholders from the 
first time you commented :-)
but I saw that the binding and driver (rockchip,rk322x-efuse) have 
already been applied, so I send this one keep the same with driver side.
Shall I resend a new patch to correct both of them to 
'rockchip,rk3228-efuse' ?


BR.
Frank
Heiko

quoted
+		reg = <0x11040000 0x20>;
+		#address-cells = <1>;
+		#size-cells = <1>;
+		clocks = <&cru PCLK_EFUSE_256>;
+		clock-names = "pclk_efuse";
+
+		/* Data cells */
+		efuse_id: id at 7 {
+			reg = <0x7 0x10>;
+		};
+		cpu_leakage: cpu_leakage at 17 {
+			reg = <0x17 0x1>;
+		};
+	};
+
  	i2c0: i2c at 11050000 {
  		compatible = "rockchip,rk3228-i2c";
  		reg = <0x11050000 0x1000>;
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help