Thread (7 messages) flat view 7 messages, 3 authors, 2017-06-05

[PATCH v2] misc: atmel-ssc: Handle return value of clk_prepare_enable and clk_prepare

From: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org (Greg KH)
Date: 2017-06-05 12:05:22
Also in: lkml

On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 11:36:52AM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
On 05/06/2017 at 14:53:30 +0530, Arvind Yadav wrote:
quoted
Hi,

Yes, Patch v1 was wrong that's why i have push v2.
clk_prepare and clk_prepare_enable can fail. There
No this is not true, they will never fail for the SSC.
How is anyone supposed to know this?  Just check the functions correctly
and move on, if they can never fail, wonderful, that's a code path that
is not going to be run.
quoted
is not harm to check it's return value. It'll not impact present
functionality.
It does impact boot time, this patch adds 112 bytes to a compressed
kernel for no reason.
It solves the issue that if someone copy/paste from this code, they will
implement something incorrectly.  You can spare the 112 bytes (which
really, seems very large for just 2 error cases, are you sure that's
right?  Just drop the string if you care about size here.

thanks,

greg k-h
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help