[PATCH v2] misc: atmel-ssc: Handle return value of clk_prepare_enable and clk_prepare
From: Alexandre Belloni <hidden>
Date: 2017-06-05 09:37:05
Also in:
lkml
On 05/06/2017 at 14:53:30 +0530, Arvind Yadav wrote:
Hi, Yes, Patch v1 was wrong that's why i have push v2. clk_prepare and clk_prepare_enable can fail. There
No this is not true, they will never fail for the SSC.
is not harm to check it's return value. It'll not impact present functionality.
It does impact boot time, this patch adds 112 bytes to a compressed kernel for no reason.
-arvind On Sunday 04 June 2017 03:47 AM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:quoted
Hi, It is getting tiring to get patches that are nor even compile tested resulting from whatever static analysis tool you used. This patch has almost no value and v1 was clearly wrong. Do you realize clk_prepare and clk_prepare_enable will never fail for the SSC? On 02/06/2017 at 11:09:02 +0530, Arvind Yadav wrote:quoted
clk_prepare_enable() and clk_prepare() can fail here and we must check its return value. Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <redacted> --- drivers/misc/atmel-ssc.c | 12 ++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/misc/atmel-ssc.c b/drivers/misc/atmel-ssc.c index b2a0340..df34b81 100644 --- a/drivers/misc/atmel-ssc.c +++ b/drivers/misc/atmel-ssc.c@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ struct ssc_device *ssc_request(unsigned int ssc_num) { int ssc_valid = 0; struct ssc_device *ssc; + int ret; spin_lock(&user_lock); list_for_each_entry(ssc, &ssc_list, list) {@@ -60,7 +61,11 @@ struct ssc_device *ssc_request(unsigned int ssc_num) ssc->user++; spin_unlock(&user_lock); - clk_prepare(ssc->clk); + ret = clk_prepare(ssc->clk); + if (ret) { + pr_err("Failed to prepare clock\n"); + return ERR_PTR(ret); + } return ssc; }@@ -195,6 +200,7 @@ static int ssc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) struct resource *regs; struct ssc_device *ssc; const struct atmel_ssc_platform_data *plat_dat; + int ret; ssc = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(struct ssc_device), GFP_KERNEL); if (!ssc) {@@ -229,7 +235,9 @@ static int ssc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) } /* disable all interrupts */ - clk_prepare_enable(ssc->clk); + ret = clk_prepare_enable(ssc->clk); + if (ret) + return ret; ssc_writel(ssc->regs, IDR, -1); ssc_readl(ssc->regs, SR); clk_disable_unprepare(ssc->clk);-- 1.9.1 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
-- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com