Hi Stephen,

Thanks for your applying.

There are other two patches sent on April 6, 2017:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9665973/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9665977/

Hope they are in your review queue. Please give it a review.

Regards,
Andy

-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Boyd [mailto:sboyd at codeaurora.org] 
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2017 4:28 PM
To: Andy Tang <redacted>
Cc: mturquette at baylibre.com; robh+dt at kernel.org; mark.rutland at arm.com; linux-clk at vger.kernel.org; devicetree at vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; Scott Wood <oss@buserror.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 v2] clk: qoriq: Separate root input clock for core PLLs on ls1012a

On 03/20, Yuantian Tang wrote:

From: Scott Wood <oss@buserror.net>

ls1012a has separate input root clocks for core PLLs versus the 
platform PLL, with the latter described as sysclk in the hw docs.
If a second input clock, named "coreclk", is present, this clock will 
be used for the core PLLs.

Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <oss@buserror.net>
Signed-off-by: Tang Yuantian <redacted>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
---

Applied to clk-next

--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project