Thread (16 messages) 16 messages, 8 authors, 2017-05-17

[PATCH V8 07/11] iommu: of: Handle IOMMU lookup failure with deferred probing or error

From: laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com (Laurent Pinchart)
Date: 2017-05-15 21:34:18
Also in: linux-acpi, linux-arm-msm, linux-iommu, linux-pci, linux-renesas-soc

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

Hi Sricharan,

On Monday 15 May 2017 23:37:16 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Wednesday 03 May 2017 15:54:59 Sricharan R wrote:
quoted
On 5/3/2017 3:24 PM, Robin Murphy wrote:
quoted
On 02/05/17 19:35, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 4:48 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
quoted
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>

Failures to look up an IOMMU when parsing the DT iommus property need
to be handled separately from the .of_xlate() failures to support
deferred probing.

The lack of a registered IOMMU can be caused by the lack of a driver
for the IOMMU, the IOMMU device probe not having been performed yet,
having been deferred, or having failed.

The first case occurs when the device tree describes the bus master
and IOMMU topology correctly but no device driver exists for the IOMMU
yet or the device driver has not been compiled in. Return NULL, the
caller will configure the device without an IOMMU.

The second and third cases are handled by deferring the probe of the
bus master device which will eventually get reprobed after the IOMMU.

The last case is currently handled by deferring the probe of the bus
master device as well. A mechanism to either configure the bus master
device without an IOMMU or to fail the bus master device probe
depending on whether the IOMMU is optional or mandatory would be a good
enhancement.

Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pichart
[off-list ref]
Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <redacted>
This patch broke Renesas R-Car Gen3 platforms in renesas-drivers.
As the IOMMU nodes in DT are not yet enabled, all devices having iommus
properties in DT now fail to probe.
How exactly do they fail to probe? Per d7b0558230e4, if there are no ops
registered then they should merely defer until we reach the point of
giving up and ignoring the IOMMU. Is it just that you have no other
late-probing drivers or post-init module loads to kick the deferred
queue after that point? I did try to find a way to explicitly kick it
from a suitably late initcall, but there didn't seem to be any obvious
public interface - anyone have any suggestions?

I think that's more of a general problem with the probe deferral
mechanism itself (I've seen the same thing happen with some of the
CoreSight stuff on Juno due to the number of inter-component
dependencies) rather than any specific fault of this series.
I was thinking of an additional check like below to avoid the
situation ?

From 499b6e662f60f23740b8880882b0a16f16434501 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sricharan R <redacted>
Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 13:16:59 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] iommu: of: Fix check for returning EPROBE_DEFER

While returning EPROBE_DEFER for iommu masters
take in to account of iommu nodes that could be
marked in DT as 'status=disabled', in which case
simply return NULL and let the master's probe
continue rather than deferring.

Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <redacted>
---

 drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c
index 9f44ee8..e6e9bec 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c
@@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ static bool of_iommu_driver_present(struct device_node
*np)

        ops = iommu_ops_from_fwnode(fwnode);
        if ((ops && !ops->of_xlate) ||
+           !of_device_is_available(iommu_spec->np) ||
            (!ops && !of_iommu_driver_present(iommu_spec->np)))
                return NULL;
This looks good to me, but won't be enough. The ipmmu-vmsa driver in
v4.12-rc1 doesn't call iommu_device_register() and thus won't be found by
iommu_ops_from_fwnode(). Furthermore, it doesn't IOMMU_OF_DECLARE(), and
thus will always be considered as absent.

I agree that the ipmmu-vmsa driver needs to be fixed, but it would have been
nice to check existing IOMMU drivers before merging this patch series...
Please pardon the question, but has this patch series been tested on ARM32 ?

When the device is probed the arch_setup_dma_ops() function is called. It sets 
the device's dma_ops and the mapping (in __arm_iommu_attach_device()). If 
probe is deferred, arch_teardown_dma_ops() is called which in turn calls 
arch_teardown_dma_ops(). This removes the mapping but doesn't touch the 
dma_ops. The next time the device is probed, arch_setup_dma_ops() bails out 
immediately as the dma_ops are already set, leaving us with a device bound to 
IOMMU operations but with no mapping. This oopses later as soon as the kernel 
tries to map memory for the device through the IOMMU.

I might be missing something obvious, but I don't see how this can work.
quoted
quoted
quoted
This can be fixed by either:
  - Disabling CONFIG_IPMMU_VMSA, or
  - Reverting commit 7b07cbefb68d486f (but keeping "int ret = 0;").

Note that this was a bit hard to investigate, as R-Car Gen3 support
wasn't upstreamed yet, so bisection pointed to a merge commit.
-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help