Thread (13 messages) 13 messages, 4 authors, 2017-05-22

[PATCH v3 4/5] drivers/perf: Add support for ARMv8.2 Statistical Profiling Extension

From: Will Deacon <hidden>
Date: 2017-05-22 11:05:22
Also in: lkml

Hi Thomas,

Thanks for having a look at the patch. Responses inline.

On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 10:36:19PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Thu, 18 May 2017, Will Deacon wrote:
quoted
+static void __arm_spe_pmu_dev_probe(void *info)
+{
+	dev_info(dev,
+		 "probed for CPUs %*pbl [max_record_sz %u, align %u, features 0x%llx]\n",
+		 cpumask_pr_args(&spe_pmu->supported_cpus),
+		 spe_pmu->max_record_sz, spe_pmu->align, spe_pmu->features);
I have a hard time to spot the place which actually sets a CPU in the
supported_cpus mask. I must be missing something, but that's what grep
gives me:

+	cpumask_t				supported_cpus;
+	return cpumap_print_to_pagebuf(true, buf, &spe_pmu->supported_cpus);
+	    !cpumask_test_cpu(event->cpu, &spe_pmu->supported_cpus))
+	if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &spe_pmu->supported_cpus))
+		 cpumask_pr_args(&spe_pmu->supported_cpus),
+	if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &spe_pmu->supported_cpus))
+	if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &spe_pmu->supported_cpus))
+	cpumask_t *mask = &spe_pmu->supported_cpus;
+	if (irq_get_percpu_devid_partition(irq, &spe_pmu->supported_cpus)) {
That's the one ^^^. The mask is determined by the affinity of the
interrupt partition.
+	cpumask_t *mask = &spe_pmu->supported_cpus;
quoted
+static int arm_spe_pmu_dev_init(struct arm_spe_pmu *spe_pmu)
+{
+	int ret;
+	cpumask_t *mask = &spe_pmu->supported_cpus;
+
+	/* Keep the hotplug state steady whilst we probe */
+	get_online_cpus();
+
+	/* Make sure we probe the hardware on a relevant CPU */
+	ret = smp_call_function_any(mask,  __arm_spe_pmu_dev_probe, spe_pmu, 1);
You can release the hotplug lock here again and spare all the goto magic.
Actually, if I rework this to use cpuhp_state_add_instance instead, then
I might be able to do without the hotplug lock altogether. I'll have a
play.
quoted
+	if (ret || !(spe_pmu->features & SPE_PMU_FEAT_DEV_PROBED)) {
+		ret = -ENXIO;
+		goto out_put_cpus;
+	}
+
+	/* Request our PPIs (note that the IRQ is still disabled) */
+	ret = request_percpu_irq(spe_pmu->irq, arm_spe_pmu_irq_handler, DRVNAME,
+				 spe_pmu->handle);
+	if (ret)
+		goto out_put_cpus;
+
+	/* Setup the CPUs in our mask -- this enables the IRQ */
+	on_each_cpu_mask(mask, __arm_spe_pmu_setup_one, spe_pmu, 1);
+
+	/* Register our hotplug notifier now so we don't miss any events */
+	ret = cpuhp_state_add_instance_nocalls(arm_spe_pmu_online,
+					       &spe_pmu->hotplug_node);
If you use cpuhp_state_add_instance() then you can spare the
on_each_cpu_mask(). The downside is that it will invoke the callback on the
non-supported CPUs as well, but you have protection in the callbacks anyway.
Yes, I think that will work and I can get rid of get_online_cpus around
the probing too.
quoted
+static int arm_spe_pmu_device_dt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	int ret;
+	struct arm_spe_pmu *spe_pmu;
+	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+
+	spe_pmu = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*spe_pmu), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!spe_pmu) {
+		dev_err(dev, "failed to allocate spe_pmu\n");
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	}
+
+	spe_pmu->handle = alloc_percpu(typeof(*spe_pmu->handle));
+	if (!spe_pmu->handle)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	spe_pmu->pdev = pdev;
+	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, spe_pmu);
+
+	ret = arm_spe_pmu_irq_probe(spe_pmu);
+	if (ret)
+		goto out_free_handle;
+
+	ret = arm_spe_pmu_dev_init(spe_pmu);
+	if (ret)
+		goto out_free_handle;
+
+	ret = arm_spe_pmu_perf_init(spe_pmu);
+	if (ret)
+		goto out_free_handle;
If that fails you leak the cpu hotplug instance. It's still enqueued.
Yikes, well spotted. That will then get called with the freed spe_pmu,
which will probably end badly.
quoted
+static int arm_spe_pmu_device_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct arm_spe_pmu *spe_pmu = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+	cpumask_t *mask = &spe_pmu->supported_cpus;
+
+	arm_spe_pmu_perf_destroy(spe_pmu);
+
+	get_online_cpus();
+	cpuhp_state_remove_instance_nocalls(arm_spe_pmu_online,
+					    &spe_pmu->hotplug_node);
+	on_each_cpu_mask(mask, __arm_spe_pmu_stop_one, spe_pmu, 1);

You can spare that dance and just use cpuhp_state_remove_instance().
Thanks, I'll fix this too.

Will
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help