[PATCH v3 4/5] drivers/perf: Add support for ARMv8.2 Statistical Profiling Extension
From: Thomas Gleixner <hidden>
Date: 2017-05-21 20:37:02
Also in:
lkml
On Thu, 18 May 2017, Will Deacon wrote:
+static void __arm_spe_pmu_dev_probe(void *info)
+{
+ dev_info(dev,
+ "probed for CPUs %*pbl [max_record_sz %u, align %u, features 0x%llx]\n",
+ cpumask_pr_args(&spe_pmu->supported_cpus),
+ spe_pmu->max_record_sz, spe_pmu->align, spe_pmu->features);
I have a hard time to spot the place which actually sets a CPU in the
supported_cpus mask. I must be missing something, but that's what grep
gives me:
+ cpumask_t supported_cpus;
+ return cpumap_print_to_pagebuf(true, buf, &spe_pmu->supported_cpus);
+ !cpumask_test_cpu(event->cpu, &spe_pmu->supported_cpus))
+ if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &spe_pmu->supported_cpus))
+ cpumask_pr_args(&spe_pmu->supported_cpus),
+ if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &spe_pmu->supported_cpus))
+ if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &spe_pmu->supported_cpus))
+ cpumask_t *mask = &spe_pmu->supported_cpus;
+ if (irq_get_percpu_devid_partition(irq, &spe_pmu->supported_cpus)) {
+ cpumask_t *mask = &spe_pmu->supported_cpus;
+static int arm_spe_pmu_dev_init(struct arm_spe_pmu *spe_pmu)
+{
+ int ret;
+ cpumask_t *mask = &spe_pmu->supported_cpus;
+
+ /* Keep the hotplug state steady whilst we probe */
+ get_online_cpus();
+
+ /* Make sure we probe the hardware on a relevant CPU */
+ ret = smp_call_function_any(mask, __arm_spe_pmu_dev_probe, spe_pmu, 1);You can release the hotplug lock here again and spare all the goto magic.
+ if (ret || !(spe_pmu->features & SPE_PMU_FEAT_DEV_PROBED)) {
+ ret = -ENXIO;
+ goto out_put_cpus;
+ }
+
+ /* Request our PPIs (note that the IRQ is still disabled) */
+ ret = request_percpu_irq(spe_pmu->irq, arm_spe_pmu_irq_handler, DRVNAME,
+ spe_pmu->handle);
+ if (ret)
+ goto out_put_cpus;
+
+ /* Setup the CPUs in our mask -- this enables the IRQ */
+ on_each_cpu_mask(mask, __arm_spe_pmu_setup_one, spe_pmu, 1);
+
+ /* Register our hotplug notifier now so we don't miss any events */
+ ret = cpuhp_state_add_instance_nocalls(arm_spe_pmu_online,
+ &spe_pmu->hotplug_node);If you use cpuhp_state_add_instance() then you can spare the on_each_cpu_mask(). The downside is that it will invoke the callback on the non-supported CPUs as well, but you have protection in the callbacks anyway.
+static int arm_spe_pmu_device_dt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ int ret;
+ struct arm_spe_pmu *spe_pmu;
+ struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+
+ spe_pmu = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*spe_pmu), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!spe_pmu) {
+ dev_err(dev, "failed to allocate spe_pmu\n");
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+
+ spe_pmu->handle = alloc_percpu(typeof(*spe_pmu->handle));
+ if (!spe_pmu->handle)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ spe_pmu->pdev = pdev;
+ platform_set_drvdata(pdev, spe_pmu);
+
+ ret = arm_spe_pmu_irq_probe(spe_pmu);
+ if (ret)
+ goto out_free_handle;
+
+ ret = arm_spe_pmu_dev_init(spe_pmu);
+ if (ret)
+ goto out_free_handle;
+
+ ret = arm_spe_pmu_perf_init(spe_pmu);
+ if (ret)
+ goto out_free_handle;If that fails you leak the cpu hotplug instance. It's still enqueued.
+static int arm_spe_pmu_device_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct arm_spe_pmu *spe_pmu = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+ cpumask_t *mask = &spe_pmu->supported_cpus;
+
+ arm_spe_pmu_perf_destroy(spe_pmu);
+
+ get_online_cpus();
+ cpuhp_state_remove_instance_nocalls(arm_spe_pmu_online,
+ &spe_pmu->hotplug_node);
+ on_each_cpu_mask(mask, __arm_spe_pmu_stop_one, spe_pmu, 1);You can spare that dance and just use cpuhp_state_remove_instance().
+ free_percpu_irq(spe_pmu->irq, spe_pmu->handle); + free_percpu(spe_pmu->handle);
Those two do not need hotplug protection. Thanks tglx