On 16/02/2017 10:46, Sanil Kumar wrote:

On 2/16/2017 3:11 PM, Ding Tianhong wrote:

quoted

On 2017/2/16 17:32, Alexander Graf wrote:

quoted

On 16/02/2017 10:14, Daniel Lezcano wrote:

quoted

On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 09:42:11AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:

[ ... ]

quoted

quoted

quoted

quoted

I believe Marc is looking at some rework in this area which may
enable
this, so please wait for that to appear.

Yeah, I'm implementing a semi-flexible way to add new quirk
types, and
the last thing I want to see is two (or more) tables describing
the same
thing.

Kindly ping, if you have patches in hand, I can test against our
platforms,
thank you very much.

Any progress on this? I'm not a big fan of stalling erratum fixes
upstream
because of potential future refactoring.

The fix is in the tip tree, soon in v4.11-rc1 when the merge will be
finished.

http://goo.gl/x90qwE
http://goo.gl/asCBBD

Oh, I missed that. Sorry for the fuss :).


Alex

Hi, I thinks the tip tree is only applied the erratum for DT, not for
ACPI, the patch
for ACPI is not applied yet, so the work isn't finished. ??

Yes, initial thread was about ACPI part. I think Alex was asking about
that.

Ah yes. Indeed.

Thanks.


-- 
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog