On 2017/2/16 17:32, Alexander Graf wrote:

On 16/02/2017 10:14, Daniel Lezcano wrote:

quoted

On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 09:42:11AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:

[ ... ]

quoted

quoted

quoted

quoted

I believe Marc is looking at some rework in this area which may enable
this, so please wait for that to appear.

Yeah, I'm implementing a semi-flexible way to add new quirk types, and
the last thing I want to see is two (or more) tables describing the same
thing.

Kindly ping, if you have patches in hand, I can test against our platforms,
thank you very much.

Any progress on this? I'm not a big fan of stalling erratum fixes upstream
because of potential future refactoring.

The fix is in the tip tree, soon in v4.11-rc1 when the merge will be finished.

http://goo.gl/x90qwE
http://goo.gl/asCBBD

Oh, I missed that. Sorry for the fuss :).


Alex

Hi, I thinks the tip tree is only applied the erratum for DT, not for ACPI, the patch
for ACPI is not applied yet, so the work isn't finished. o<o<	

Thanks
Ding

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

.