[PATCH -next v2] pinctrl: samsung: Fix return value check in samsung_pinctrl_get_soc_data()
From: krzk@kernel.org (Krzysztof Kozlowski)
Date: 2017-02-21 15:33:36
Also in:
linux-gpio, linux-samsung-soc
From: krzk@kernel.org (Krzysztof Kozlowski)
Date: 2017-02-21 15:33:36
Also in:
linux-gpio, linux-samsung-soc
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Marek Szyprowski [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi All, On 2017-02-13 15:49, Linus Walleij wrote:quoted
On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 4:58 PM, Wei Yongjun [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
From: Wei Yongjun <redacted> In case of error, the function devm_ioremap() returns NULL pointer not ERR_PTR(). Fix by using devm_ioremap_resource instead of devm_ioremap. Fixes: 8b1bd11c1f8f ("pinctrl: samsung: Add the support the multiple IORESOURCE_MEM for one pin-bank") Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <redacted> --- v1 -> v2: use devm_ioremap_resource instead of devm_ioremapPatch applied with Krzysztof's ACK.Sadly this patch breaks support for IMEM pinctrl block on Exynos5433/TM2 and it took us some time to find the source of the problem. devm_ioremap_resource() is not functionally a full equivalent of devm_ioremap(). The problem here is that registers for IMEM and ALIVE pin controllers are shared and both devices have <0x11090000 0x1000> range in their reg property. devm_ioremap_resource() maps given resource exclusively for the device, while devm_ioremap() allows non-exclusive mappings. This patch has to be reverted asap.
Damn, the additional request_mem_region() raised my concerns but I didn't compare it with actual DTS layout... Which brings us to two important lessons: 1. Do not accept untested code. 2. Do not fix two things at the same time. I vote for the revert as well + original version of patch (these two could be squashed) + a need of Tested-by. Otherwise an untested fix might not be a fix at all. Best regards, Krzysztof