On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 11:48:56PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:

+		mmc at 01c0f000 {

Please use a label based syntax here too.

+			compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-a64-mmc",
+				     "allwinner,sun5i-a13-mmc";

The compatibility with the A13 has never been true, and the compatible
should be "allwinner,sun50i-h5-mmc", "allwinner,sun50i-a64-mmc".

+			clocks = <&ccu CLK_BUS_MMC0>, <&ccu CLK_MMC0>;
+			clock-names = "ahb", "mmc";
+		};
+
+		mmc at 01c10000 {
+			compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-a64-mmc",
+				     "allwinner,sun5i-a13-mmc";
+			clocks = <&ccu CLK_BUS_MMC1>, <&ccu CLK_MMC1>;
+			clock-names = "ahb", "mmc";
+		};
+
+		mmc at 01c11000 {
+			compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-a64-mmc",

And this is very likely to use the emmc compatible.

+				     "allwinner,sun5i-a13-mmc";
+			clocks = <&ccu CLK_BUS_MMC2>, <&ccu CLK_MMC2>;
+			clock-names = "ahb", "mmc";
+		};
+
+		clock at 01c20000 {
+			compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-h5-ccu",
+				     "allwinner,sun8i-h3-ccu";
+		};

If it doesn't have the same clocks, it's not compatible with the H3.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20170127/c94c221b/attachment-0001.sig>