Hi Mark,
On 17 January 2017 at 20:29, Mark Rutland [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 06:18:12AM -0600, Timur Tabi wrote:
quoted
Fu Wei wrote:
quoted
if (i >= ARCH_TIMER_MEM_MAX_FRAMES) {
pr_err(FW_BUG "too many frames, ARMv8 spec only allows 8.\n");
pr_err(FW_BUG "too many frames, ARMv8 spec only allows %u.\n",
ARCH_TIMER_MEM_MAX_FRAMES);
While I don't see ARCH_TIMER_MEM_MAX_FRAMES changing, this would be
nicer to ensure the result obviously matches.
As for wording, I'd perfer:
pr_err(FW_BUG "too many frames, only %u are permitted.\n",
ARCH_TIMER_MEM_MAX_FRAMES);
OK, will do so.
Thanks!
... so as to avoid any confusion between spec versions and so on. We can
reconsider the message if/when that changes.
Thanks,
Mark.
--
Best regards,
Fu Wei
Software Engineer
Red Hat