Thread (31 messages) flat view 31 messages, 3 authors, 2017-01-18

[PATCH v19 05/15] clocksource/drivers/arm_arch_timer: rework PPI determination

From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
Date: 2017-01-16 17:30:59
Also in: linux-acpi, linux-watchdog, lkml

On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 02:45:53PM +0800, fu.wei at linaro.org wrote:
[...]
-	if (is_hyp_mode_available() || !arch_timer_ppi[ARCH_TIMER_VIRT_PPI]) {
-		bool has_ppi;
+	if (is_hyp_mode_available() && is_kernel_in_hyp_mode())
+		return ARCH_TIMER_HYP_PPI;
 
-		if (is_kernel_in_hyp_mode()) {
-			arch_timer_uses_ppi = ARCH_TIMER_HYP_PPI;
-			has_ppi = !!arch_timer_ppi[ARCH_TIMER_HYP_PPI];
-		} else {
-			arch_timer_uses_ppi = ARCH_TIMER_PHYS_SECURE_PPI;
-			has_ppi = (!!arch_timer_ppi[ARCH_TIMER_PHYS_SECURE_PPI] ||
-				   !!arch_timer_ppi[ARCH_TIMER_PHYS_NONSECURE_PPI]);
-		}
+	if (arch_timer_ppi[ARCH_TIMER_VIRT_PPI])
+		return ARCH_TIMER_VIRT_PPI;
 
-		if (!has_ppi) {
-			pr_warn("No interrupt available, giving up\n");
-			return -EINVAL;
-		}
-	}
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64))
+		return ARCH_TIMER_PHYS_NONSECURE_PPI;
+
+	return ARCH_TIMER_PHYS_SECURE_PPI;
For a 32-bit platform booted at hyp (with a virt PPI available), the new
logic will select ARCH_TIMER_VIRT_PPI. I beleive that will break KVM.

I think the logic should be:

	if (is_kernel_in_hyp_mode())
		return ARCH_TIMER_HYP_PPI;

	if (!is_hyp_mode_available() &&
	    arch_timer_ppi[ARCH_TIMER_VIRT_PPI])
	    	return ARCH_TIMER_VIRT_PPI;
	
	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64))
		return ARCH_TIMER_PHYS_NONSECURE_PPI;
	
	return ARCH_TIMER_PHYS_SECURE_PPI;

Please use that instead (keeping the comment you retained).
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+static int __init arch_timer_init(void)
+{
+	int ret;
 
 	ret = arch_timer_register();
 	if (ret)
@@ -904,6 +906,13 @@ static int __init arch_timer_of_init(struct device_node *np)
 	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM) &&
 	    of_property_read_bool(np, "arm,cpu-registers-not-fw-configured"))
 		arch_timer_uses_ppi = ARCH_TIMER_PHYS_SECURE_PPI;
+	else
+		arch_timer_uses_ppi = arch_timer_select_ppi();
+
+	if (!arch_timer_ppi[arch_timer_uses_ppi]) {
+		pr_err("No interrupt available, giving up\n");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
 
 	/* On some systems, the counter stops ticking when in suspend. */
 	arch_counter_suspend_stop = of_property_read_bool(np,
@@ -1049,6 +1058,12 @@ static int __init arch_timer_acpi_init(struct acpi_table_header *table)
 	/* Get the frequency from CNTFRQ */
 	arch_timer_detect_rate(NULL, NULL);
 
+	arch_timer_uses_ppi = arch_timer_select_ppi();
+	if (!arch_timer_ppi[arch_timer_uses_ppi]) {
+		pr_err("No interrupt available, giving up\n");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
I see that we have to duplicate this so we can special-case the
DT-specific behaviour, so that's fine by me.

If you can fix the arch_timer_select_ppi() logic as above, this should
be fine.

Thanks,
Mark.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help