[PATCH v4 7/9] arm64: cpufeature: Track user visible fields
From: Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com (Suzuki K Poulose)
Date: 2017-01-10 14:26:03
Also in:
lkml
On 10/01/17 14:24, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 05:28:30PM +0000, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:quoted
Changes since V3: - Mark ID_AA64ISAR0_EL1:RDM visible[...]quoted
static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_aa64isar0[] = { - ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_STRICT, FTR_EXACT, ID_AA64ISAR0_RDM_SHIFT, 4, 0), - ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64ISAR0_ATOMICS_SHIFT, 4, 0), - ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64ISAR0_CRC32_SHIFT, 4, 0), - ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64ISAR0_SHA2_SHIFT, 4, 0), - ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64ISAR0_SHA1_SHIFT, 4, 0), - ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64ISAR0_AES_SHIFT, 4, 0), + ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_VISIBLE, FTR_STRICT, FTR_EXACT, ID_AA64ISAR0_RDM_SHIFT, 4, 0),As I said in an earlier reply, I'd like the RDM exposing to come together with a patch presenting the corresponding HWCAP bit. But it's fine by me if you add the HWCAP separately from this patch, in which case my ack still stands.
Catalin, Yes, I have a separate patch for that. Thanks Suzuki