Thread (20 messages) flat view 20 messages, 6 authors, 2016-12-07
STALE3531d

Revision v2 of 8 in this series.

Revisions (8)
  1. v2 [diff vs current]
  2. v2 [diff vs current]
  3. v2 [diff vs current]
  4. v2 [diff vs current]
  5. v2 current
  6. v2 [diff vs current]
  7. v2 [diff vs current]
  8. v2 [diff vs current]

[PATCH v2 1/2] arm64: dts: zx: Fix gic GICR property

From: Marc Zyngier <hidden>
Date: 2016-12-02 17:02:28

Just noticed this.

On 13/10/16 13:31, Jun Nie wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
GICR for multiple CPU can be described with start address and stride,
or with multiple address. Current multiple address and stride are
both used. Fix it.

vmalloc patch 727a7f5a9 triggered this bug:
[    0.097146] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffff000008060008
[    0.097150] pgd = ffff000008602000
[    0.097160] [ffff000008060008] *pgd=000000007fffe003, *pud=000000007fffd003, *pmd=000000007fffc003, *pte=0000000000000000
[    0.097165] Internal error: Oops: 96000007 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[    0.097170] Modules linked in:
[    0.097177] CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Not tainted 4.8.0+ #1474
[    0.097179] Hardware name: ZTE zx296718 evaluation board (DT)
[    0.097183] task: ffff80003e8c8b80 task.stack: ffff80003e8d0000
[    0.097197] PC is at gic_populate_rdist+0x74/0x15c
[    0.097202] LR is at gic_starting_cpu+0xc/0x20
[    0.097206] pc : [<ffff0000082b1b18>] lr : [<ffff0000082b26e0>] pstate: 600001c5

Signed-off-by: Jun Nie <redacted>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/zte/zx296718.dtsi | 11 +++--------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/zte/zx296718.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/zte/zx296718.dtsi
index a223066..6b239a3 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/zte/zx296718.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/zte/zx296718.dtsi
@@ -239,16 +239,11 @@
 		compatible = "arm,gic-v3";
 		#interrupt-cells = <3>;
 		#address-cells = <0>;
-		#redistributor-regions = <6>;
-		redistributor-stride = <0x0 0x40000>;
+		#redistributor-regions = <1>;
+		redistributor-stride = <0x20000>;
Why is that stride specified? Is the GIC implementation so busted that
the GICR_TYPER do not report a GICv3 redistributor, which implies a
128kB stride?

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help