[PATCH v12 RESEND 0/4] generic TEE subsystem
From: Andrew F. Davis <hidden>
Date: 2016-11-01 19:22:04
Also in:
linux-devicetree, lkml
From: Andrew F. Davis <hidden>
Date: 2016-11-01 19:22:04
Also in:
linux-devicetree, lkml
On 10/28/2016 01:19 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 10:43:24AM -0500, Andrew F. Davis wrote:quoted
Do we see this as a chicken and egg situation, or is there any harm beyond the pains of supporting an out-of-tree driver for a while, to wait until we have at least one other TEE to add to this subsystem before merging?We haven't been overburneded with TEE vendors wanting to get their driver code into mainline - do we have any reasonable prospect of other TEE vendors with an interest in mainline turning up in any kind of reasonable timeframe?
Doesn't look like anyone has near-term plans for upstreaming non-OPTEE TEEs, we don't at least (TI), so I guess I see no reason right now to delay upstreaming of this TEE's driver on the off-chance it is incompatible with a TEE that may or may not try to get upstreamed later. I'll redact my objection for now.