Thread (12 messages) 12 messages, 4 authors, 2016-11-03

[PATCH v12 RESEND 0/4] generic TEE subsystem

From: Andrew F. Davis <hidden>
Date: 2016-11-01 19:22:04
Also in: linux-devicetree, lkml

On 10/28/2016 01:19 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 10:43:24AM -0500, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
quoted
Do we see this as a chicken and egg situation, or is there any harm
beyond the pains of supporting an out-of-tree driver for a while, to
wait until we have at least one other TEE to add to this subsystem
before merging?
We haven't been overburneded with TEE vendors wanting to get their
driver code into mainline - do we have any reasonable prospect of other
TEE vendors with an interest in mainline turning up in any kind of
reasonable timeframe?
Doesn't look like anyone has near-term plans for upstreaming non-OPTEE
TEEs, we don't at least (TI), so I guess I see no reason right now to
delay upstreaming of this TEE's driver on the off-chance it is
incompatible with a TEE that may or may not try to get upstreamed later.
I'll redact my objection for now.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help