[PATCH v12 RESEND 0/4] generic TEE subsystem
From: broonie@kernel.org (Mark Brown)
Date: 2016-10-28 18:36:35
Also in:
linux-devicetree, lkml
From: broonie@kernel.org (Mark Brown)
Date: 2016-10-28 18:36:35
Also in:
linux-devicetree, lkml
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 10:43:24AM -0500, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
Do we see this as a chicken and egg situation, or is there any harm beyond the pains of supporting an out-of-tree driver for a while, to wait until we have at least one other TEE to add to this subsystem before merging?
We haven't been overburneded with TEE vendors wanting to get their driver code into mainline - do we have any reasonable prospect of other TEE vendors with an interest in mainline turning up in any kind of reasonable timeframe? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 455 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20161028/3adb9948/attachment.sig>