Am 28.10.2016 um 16:38 schrieb Marc Zyngier [off-list ref]:

Alex,

quoted

On 30/09/16 20:31, Alexander Graf wrote:

quoted

On 30.09.16 17:43, Christoffer Dall wrote:

quoted

On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 05:38:11PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:

quoted

On 30.09.16 16:54, Alexander Graf wrote:

quoted

On 27.09.16 21:08, Christoffer Dall wrote:
Hi Alex,

Marc and I have been looking at this during Linaro connect and have
slightly reworked your patch into this small series.

It would be good if you could have a look at it and test it out.

I've tested it with your QEMU, and it works for UP, but secondary CPUs
fail to come up, and it looks like the kernel never gets an IPI for
those CPUs from userspace.  Any chance you're willing to take a look at
that?

I still need to see whether I can come up with a prettier solution, but
for now this works:

diff --git a/target-i386/kvm.c b/target-i386/kvm.c

Eh, no, not in i386 code :). But the problem seems to be a missing
mpstate sync.

Yeah, that looked really dodgy.  Have you tested it? :)

This time around tested with the correct command line parameters I hope
:). I'll send a pretty patch later.

diff --git a/target-arm/kvm.c b/target-arm/kvm.c
index b4c8fe2..b549f00 100644
--- a/target-arm/kvm.c
+++ b/target-arm/kvm.c

@@ -173,6 +173,12 @@ int kvm_arch_init(MachineState *ms, KVMState *s)
     */
    kvm_async_interrupts_allowed = true;

+    /*
+     * PSCI wakes up secondary cores, so we always need to
+     * have vCPUs waiting in kernel space
+     */
+    kvm_halt_in_kernel_allowed = true;
+
    cap_has_mp_state = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_MP_STATE);

    type_register_static(&host_arm_cpu_type_info);

What the status of userspace for this thing? Are QEMU patches being
posted and reviewed?

I didn't see a notification that the patches were merged. Are they in Linus' tree yet? Then I can post enablement to qemu-devel.

Alex