On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 07:01:12PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:

Hi,

On Wednesday, July 13, 2016 04:37:31 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote:

quoted

On Wednesday, July 13, 2016 12:59:23 PM CEST Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:

quoted

On Friday, July 08, 2016 10:23:48 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote:

quoted

On Friday, July 8, 2016 5:24:41 PM CEST Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:

quoted

This patch disables deprecated IDE subsystem in assabet_defconfig
(no IDE host drivers are selected in this config so there is no
valid reason to enable IDE subsystem itself).

Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <redacted>

I think the series makes a lot of sense. I have checked your assertions
in the changelogs and found no flaws in your logic, so I think we should
take them all through arm-soc unless there are other concerns.

Thank you.

Should I resend everything or just patches that were not reposted yet
(the ones that were marked as RFT initially and got no feedback)?

I'd be fine with just getting a pull request with all the patches that
had no negative feedback and that were not already applied (if any).

Here it is (sorry for taking so long).

I've just been digging in the dmesg logs from when I was using the
Assabet+Neponset as my firewall, and it was having to use the IDE
ide-cs driver rather than the pata pcmcia driver.

I don't recall whether the pata pcmcia driver was a problem or not,
as the PCMCIA interface can't cope with _any_ 32-bit accesses.  I
think PATA tries to use the "highest" possible access size by
default...

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.