quoted

I intentionally don't ask people to send me the patches squashed. So,
you will have them seperate in patchwork et al. I only squash them just
before commiting to my tree. That's because I found that when digging
through git history, it is much more convenient to have all the
information in one commit.

If git history was the only thing that mattered, then that would be
fine. But it is not. Maintainers should apply what's on the list.
Period.

Huh? If you would *ask* me to stop squashing, I am listening to reasons.
If you want to force arbitrary rules on me, I am not. There are reasons
where squashing/modifying patches makes more sense compared to forcing
the author to resend. DTS bindings may not be one, we can discuss that.
But that rule without allowing exceptions seems impractical to me.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20160924/8e01fc6e/attachment.sig>