On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 5:13 PM, Wolfram Sang [off-list ref] wrote:

On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 10:01:13AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:

quoted

On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Wolfram Sang [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 11:49:15AM +0200, Jerome Brunet wrote:

quoted

This patchset adds a specific compatible string in the Meson I2C driver
for the Amlogic Meson gxbb SoC.

Other patch series (pinctrl and device tree) are being sent to complete
the i2c support on meson gxbb

Neil Armstrong (2):
  i2c: meson: add gxbb compatible string
  dt-bindings: i2c-meson: add gxbb compatible string

Squashed both patches and applied to for-next, thanks!

Please don't squash. We ask people to split DT bindings for a reason
being reviews and bindings may not go thru subsystem maintainers in
the future. It also makes it harder to find things in the archives or
patchwork (as does maintainer fixups of subject lines).

I intentionally don't ask people to send me the patches squashed. So,
you will have them seperate in patchwork et al. I only squash them just
before commiting to my tree. That's because I found that when digging
through git history, it is much more convenient to have all the
information in one commit.

If git history was the only thing that mattered, then that would be
fine. But it is not. Maintainers should apply what's on the list.
Period. You wouldn't fixup pull requests to make the commit history
more to your liking, would you?

Rob