On Thursday, September 1, 2016 10:37:31 PM CEST David Miller wrote:

From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2016 21:23:52 -0700

quoted

David Miller [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

From: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 20:49:28 +0200

quoted

On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 5:40 AM, David Miller [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

From: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>

I think patches 1, 3 and 4 should go through the net-next tree (as
these touch drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/ and the corresponding
documentation).
Patch 2 should probably go through clk-meson-gxbb / clk-next (just
like the other clk changes we had).
The last patch (patch 5) should probably go through the ARM SoC tree
(just like the other dts changes we had).

@David, Kevin: would this be fine for you?

I would prefer if all of the patches went through one tree, that way
all the dependencies are satisfied in one place.

David, with your ack on the drivers/net changes, I can take them through
my tree for Amlogic SoCs (which then goes via the arm-soc tree.)

Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Thanks!

Note that we (in arm-soc) normally put drivers and DT changes into
separate branches and send a pull request for each branch separately
(though usually on the same day).

We expect there to be no runtime dependency between the DT changes
and the driver changes other than requiring both to make use of
the added features.

Kevin/Martin: in case this one does have a runtime dependency,
please we can put both halves into the next/drivers branch in
the correct order to ensure that they are applied together, and
describe the dependency in the cover letter for the pull request.

	Arnd