On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 07:52:05PM +0200, Rask Ingemann Lambertsen wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 05:29:07PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
quoted
This seems like you have buggy constraints, constraints which allow
voltages that can't physically be satisfied don't make obvious sense.
No, it's for cases like this (see the cubietruck4 or a80-optimus dts
patches):
reg_bldo4: bldo4 {
regulator-min-microvolt = <1080000>;
regulator-max-microvolt = <1320000>;
regulator-name = "vcc12-hsic";
};
The regulator can do 1100000 uV, 1200000 uV and 1300000 uV, all of which
are within the constraints, so obviously the constraints can be satisfied,
yet the regulator core fails do so with a message like this:
Sure, but the constraints also say that you can do 1.32V which the
system is not physically capable of delivering. That's not a good sign
for the constraints, it suggests that at least the capabilities of the
regulator have not been taken into consideration when setting up the
constraints.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20160822/7f58a619/attachment.sig>