[PATCH v11 04/10] genirq/msi-doorbell: allow MSI doorbell (un)registration
From: Thomas Gleixner <hidden>
Date: 2016-07-19 14:24:37
Also in:
kvm, kvmarm, linux-iommu, lkml
From: Thomas Gleixner <hidden>
Date: 2016-07-19 14:24:37
Also in:
kvm, kvmarm, linux-iommu, lkml
On Tue, 19 Jul 2016, Eric Auger wrote:
+
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/irq.h>
+#include <linux/msi-doorbell.h>
+
+struct irqchip_doorbell {
+ struct irq_chip_msi_doorbell_info info;
+ struct list_head next;Again, please align the struct members.
+};
+
+static LIST_HEAD(irqchip_doorbell_list);
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(irqchip_doorbell_mutex);
+
+struct irq_chip_msi_doorbell_info *
+msi_doorbell_register_global(phys_addr_t base, size_t size,
+ int prot, bool irq_remapping)
+{
+ struct irqchip_doorbell *db;
+
+ db = kmalloc(sizeof(*db), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!db)
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+
+ db->info.doorbell_is_percpu = false;Please use kzalloc and get rid of zero initialization. If you add stuff to the struct then initialization will be automatically 0.
+void msi_doorbell_unregister_global(struct irq_chip_msi_doorbell_info *dbinfo)
+{
+ struct irqchip_doorbell *db, *tmp;
+
+ mutex_lock(&irqchip_doorbell_mutex);
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(db, tmp, &irqchip_doorbell_list, next) {
Why do you need that iterator?
db = container_of(dbinfo, struct ....., info);
Hmm?
+ if (dbinfo == &db->info) {
+ list_del(&db->next);
+ kfree(db);Please move the kfree() outside of the lock region. It does not matter much here, but we really should stop doing random crap in locked regions. Thanks, tglx