On Monday, July 11, 2016 04:44:30 PM Abhilash Kesavan wrote:

Hi Bartlomiej,

Hi Abhilash,

Thanks for the comments.

On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Hi

On Thursday, July 07, 2016 12:45:57 PM Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:

quoted

On 07/05/2016 10:29 PM, Abhilash Kesavan wrote:

quoted

Exynos7 has the same CPU clock registers layout as that present

Please precise for which Exynos7 SoC this change is needed
(all three of them?).

As mentioned in my recently posted PMU series, the exynos7 is a quad
core A57 based SoC and not meant to be a SoC family.

I suppose that it will get some more meaningful name once released
officially (I couldn't find anything about this SoC on the net).

I have reviewed various exynos7xxx UMs in terms of the CPU CMU. Both
exynos7580 and exynos7420 have a similar CMU register layout along
with the same mux stat bits as exynos7. Exynos7870 on the other hand
is quite different.

Please let me know what naming convention you would prefer that I use
E7/E7420/E7580 ?

I would prefer using E7420 naming.
 

quoted

quoted

quoted

in Exynos5433 except for the bits in the MUX_STAT* registers.
Add a new CLK_CPU_HAS_MODIFIED_MUX_STAT flag to handle this change.

quoted

--- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-cpu.h
+++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-cpu.h

@@ -63,6 +63,8 @@ struct exynos_cpuclk {
 /* The CPU clock registers have Exynos5433-compatible layout */
 #define CLK_CPU_HAS_E5433_REGS_LAYOUT      (1 << 2)

quoted

+/* Exynos5433-compatible layout with different MUX_STAT register bits */
+#define CLK_CPU_HAS_MODIFIED_MUX_STAT      (1 << 3)

It's getting a bit messy, what if there comes another SoC version
which has some other modification of exynos5433 registers structure?
We would need another variant of HAS_MODIFIED_MUX_STAT flag and we
could easily get lost while trying to determine which modification
is which. How about indicating explicitly it's an exynos7 bits
layout and renaming the flag to something like

#define CLK_CPU_HAS_E7_MUX_STAT       (1 << 16) ?

ditto

Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics