[RFC PATCH] clocksource: arm_arch_timer: disable the evtstrm via the cmdline
From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
Date: 2016-06-20 13:44:30
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 02:30:02PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 02:59:11PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:quoted
On 06/20/2016 10:21 AM, Will Deacon wrote:quoted
On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 10:08:38PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:quoted
On 06/17/2016 03:43 PM, Will Deacon wrote: [ Cc'ed tglx ]quoted
Disabling the eventstream can be useful for debugging and development purposesIf it is for debugging and development, why upstream this change ?Mainly because it's desirable to be able to debug systems remotely, on machines that you don't have direct access to and where recompiling the kernel isn't necessarily an option. There are plenty of "no*" kernel parameters already that fall into a similar category.if the kernel is in development and debug, why this option can't be part of debugging code ? If recompiling isn't an option, how this can be for "debugging and development" ?Sorry, I wasn't very clear. The sort of use-case I'm envisaging is where somebody is running a distro kernel on non-public hardware and sends me an email about spinlock performance. Being able to disable the event stream easily is a powerful tool in the small box of remote debugging tools and would be useful in pinning down things like missing events. So when I say "development and debug" I'm really thinking about *remote* debug via a user, and then potentially the subsequent development of a patch.
We should probably place this rationale in the commit message. e.g. (fake emphasis): Disabling the eventstream can be useful for *remotely* debugging *a deployed production system*. Mark.