On 06/14, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 11:55:17AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
quoted
On 06/14, Linus Walleij wrote:
quoted
+
+ pm8901-regulators {
I'd rather have regulators at 8901 and regulators at 8058. That way the
node name is generic per ePAPR suggestions.
But ePAPR requires reg= if you specify a unit-address part of the
node name.
It seems the ePAPR also leaves this open to interpretation
because it states:
"The binding for a particular bus may specify additional, more
specific requirements for the format of reg and unit-address."
but we haven't done anything formal for the RPM "bus" so far. I'm
not worried either way, just a fun fact!
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project