On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 12:48:53PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 06/14, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
quoted
On Tue 14 Jun 11:55 PDT 2016, Stephen Boyd wrote:
quoted
On 06/14, Linus Walleij wrote:
quoted
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8660.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8660.dtsi
[..]
quoted
quoted
+
+ pm8901-regulators {
I'd rather have regulators at 8901 and regulators at 8058. That way the
node name is generic per ePAPR suggestions.
I agree, but unfortunately we're not allowed to do that without a
matching "reg = <>" anymore.
Oh does dtc blow up now?
I think latest dtc complains, maybe with some additional warning enables.
However, the requirement has been there for a long time in ePAPR:
"The unit-address must match the first address specified in the reg
property of the node. If the node has no reg property, the @ and
unit-address must be omitted and the node-name alone differentiates
the node from other nodes at the same level in the tree."
--
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.