On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 03:51:52PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 10:21:35AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
quoted
We're renaming the 'st,pwm-num-chan' binding to 'st,pwm-num-devs' to
be more inline with the naming conventions of the subsystem. Where
we used to treat each line as a channel, the PWM convention is to
describe them as devices.
That's all linux implementation details and you are breaking
compatibility.
While it's true that the API calls channels struct pwm_device, that's
primarily for historical reasons. It's completely fine, and in fact most
drivers already do exactly that, to internally refer to channels as
channels.
Thierry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20160610/494ab9c9/attachment.sig>