Thread (60 messages) 60 messages, 6 authors, 2016-04-26
STALE3712d

[PATCH 26/45] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-new: Add GICv3 IDREGS register handler

From: andre.przywara@arm.com (André Przywara)
Date: 2016-04-19 12:57:33
Also in: kvm, kvmarm

Hi Peter,

thanks for going through the pain of looking into this!

On 19/04/16 13:34, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 15 April 2016 at 18:11, Andre Przywara [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
---
 virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic_mmio.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic_mmio.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic_mmio.c
index 7d275a7..dafa235 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic_mmio.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic_mmio.c
@@ -784,6 +784,23 @@ static int vgic_mmio_read_v3r_iidr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
        return 0;
 }

+static int vgic_mmio_read_v3_idregs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+                                   struct kvm_io_device *dev,
+                                   gpa_t addr, int len, void *val)
+{
+       u32 regnr = (addr & 0x3f) - (GICD_IDREGS & 0x3f);
+       u32 reg = 0;
+
+       switch (regnr + GICD_IDREGS) {
+       case GICD_PIDR2:
+               /* report a GICv3 compliant implementation */
+               reg = 0x3b;
+               break;
+       }
We claim to be an ARM implementation, so we should report the full
set of ARM ID registers, not just GICD_PIDR2:
Do we really have to? Please note that though we say our implementor is
ARM (because we lack alternatives, I think), we don't claim to be a
GIC-500, for instance, but a made-up KVM implementation.
So there is no need to implement the other ID registers, except for the
architecturally defined PIDR2, which Linux actually checks to confirm
that this is a GICv3 compliant GIC.
        0x44, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x92, 0xB4, 0x3B, 0x00, 0x0D, 0xF0, 0x05, 0xB1
Yes, I had those registers defined like this in an earlier version, but
Marc's comment IIRC correctly was that we shouldn't claim to be a
GIC-500, for instance, because then we would need to mimic GIC-500
behavior quite closely, which we simply don't and also don't want to.

So architecturally we are fine, I think.

Do you think by claiming coming from ARM we are obliged to implement all
the other PIDR/CIDR registers the ARM way?

Cheers,
Andre.
(starting at 0xFFD0 and going up to 0xFFFC.)
quoted
+       write_mask32(reg , addr & 3, len, val);
+       return 0;
+}
 #endif
thanks
-- PMM
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help